Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

MRS fitting challenge data setup by ISMRM MRS study group

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Statistics
View Statistics

Collection period

2016-03-01
2016-03-01

Date completed

2016-12-31

Date updated

Time period coverage

Geographic coverage

Source information

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

MRS fitting challenge data setup by ISMRM MRS study group

Published Date

2021-04-16

Group

Author Contact

Marjanska, Malgorzata
gosia@umn.edu

Type

Dataset
Simulation Data

Abstract

Fitting of the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data plays an important role in the quantification of metabolite concentrations. A number of commercial and home-built packages are available and used by the MRS community to fit spectra. The question arose whether any one of these packages was superior to the others or whether they all perform similarly if appropriately used. Hence, in preparation for a workshop of the ISMRM MRS study group on MR Spectroscopy: from Current Best Practice to Latest Frontiers, which took place in August 2016, it was decided by the organizing committee, that this question should be tackled by a fitting challenge open to everybody, where a set of spectra would be evaluated. For this purpose, synthetic MRS data were generated for 28 datasets. Short-echo time PRESS spectra were simulated using ideal pulses for the common metabolites at mostly near-normal brain concentrations. A macromolecular contribution was also included. Modulations of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lineshape type and width, concentrations of γ-aminobutyric acid, glutathione and macromolecules, and inclusion of artifacts and lipid signals to mimic tumor spectra were included as challenges to be coped with.

Description

The deposited data contains 28 datasets, basis sets, Cr dataset for testing scaling, and ground truth values for all datasets. The datasets and basis sets are provided in various formats described below. Here are details of what is inside: 28 datasets are provided in three formats: 1. text file (column 1: real part of water suppressed FID; column 2: imaginary part of water suppressed FID; column 3: real part of water FID; column 4: imaginary part of water FID) 2. LCModel (.RAW and .h2o) 3. jMRUI (ASCII txt formats for both water suppressed [WS] and water spectra) The metabolite basis sets with macromolecular baseline are provided in these four formats: 1. text file (column 1: real part of FID; column 2: imaginary part of FID) for each metabolite and macromolecular baseline (MMBL) 2. text file with no reference peak at 0 ppm (column 1: real part of FID; column 2: imaginary part of FID) for each metabolite and MMBL 3. LCModel (.RAW) for each metabolite and MMBL and .BASIS 4. jMRUI (ASCII txt file format) for each metabolite and MMBL Cr scaling. An additional dataset, Cr_10mM_test_water_scaling (text, LCModel, jMRUI), is provided for testing water scaling. This dataset contains a Cr spectrum which - with correct water scaling - should come out to be 10.83 mM. metabolite concentration = (relaxation corrected water concentration) * (metabolite relaxation correction) * metabolite area / water area relaxation corrected water concentration = 1 mol / 18.015 g * 0.6 * 0.78 g/ml * exp(-30 ms/110 ms) + 1 mol/18.015 g * 0.4 *0.65 g/ml * exp(-30 ms/80 ms) = 29697 mM metabolite relaxation correction = 1/(exp(-30 ms/160 ms)) = 1.206 The following parameters describe the simulated data: Frequency = 123.2 MHz Sequence: PRESS TE = 30 ms, TE1 = 11 ms, TE2 = 19 ms TR >> T1’s Spectral width = 4000 Hz Number of points = 2048 Tissue content: GM = 60%, WM = 40% Water content: GM = 0.78 g/ml, WM = 0.65 g/ml T2 of water: GM = 110 ms, WM = 80 ms T2 of metabolites = 160 ms All metabolites datasets were generated using ideal pulses except for MMBL which was obtained experimentally. Glucose was simulated using both anomers, 0.36 alpha-glucose and 0.64 beta-glucose. The datasets may contain some or all of the metabolites listed among the basis spectra. In addition, lipid resonances and artifacts may be present.

Referenced by

Clarke WT, Stagg CJ, Jbabdi S. FSL-MRS: An end-to-end spectroscopy analysis package. Magn Reson Med. 2021 Jun;85(6):2950-2964. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28630. Epub 2020 Dec 6. PMID: 33280161; PMCID: PMC7116822. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33280161/
Das, D., Coello, E., Schulte, R. F., & Menze, B. H. (2017, September). Quantification of metabolites in magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using machine learning. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (pp. 462-470). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_53

Related to

Replaces

item.page.isreplacedby

Publisher

Funding information

NIH

item.page.sponsorshipfunderid

item.page.sponsorshipfundingagency

item.page.sponsorshipgrant

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Marjanska, Malgorzata; Deelchand, Dinesh K; Kreis, Roland. (2021). MRS fitting challenge data setup by ISMRM MRS study group. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), https://doi.org/10.13020/kw61-3j13.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.