Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework

Alternative title

Published Date

1986

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

In cognition research, item writing rules are considered a necessary prerequisite of item banking. A set of 636 items was constructed using prespecified cognitive operations. An evaluation of test data from some 7,400 examinees revealed 446 homogeneous items. Some items had to be discarded because of printing flaws, and others because of operation complexion or other well-describable reasons. However, cognitive operations explained item difficulty parameters quite well; further cross-validation research may contribute to an item writing approach which attempts to bring psychological theory and psychometric models closer together. This will eventually free item construction from item writer idiosyncrasies.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Hornke, Lutz F & Habon, Michael W. (1986). Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 369-380. doi:10.1177/014662168601000405

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168601000405

Suggested citation

Hornke, Lutz F.; Habon, Michael W.. (1986). Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/102831.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.