Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1986
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
In cognition research, item writing rules are considered
a necessary prerequisite of item banking. A set of
636 items was constructed using prespecified cognitive
operations. An evaluation of test data from some
7,400 examinees revealed 446 homogeneous items.
Some items had to be discarded because of printing
flaws, and others because of operation complexion or
other well-describable reasons. However, cognitive
operations explained item difficulty parameters quite
well; further cross-validation research may contribute
to an item writing approach which attempts to bring
psychological theory and psychometric models closer
together. This will eventually free item construction
from item writer idiosyncrasies.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Hornke, Lutz F & Habon, Michael W. (1986). Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 369-380. doi:10.1177/014662168601000405
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168601000405
Suggested citation
Hornke, Lutz F.; Habon, Michael W.. (1986). Rule-based item bank construction and evaluation within the linear logistic framework. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/102831.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.