Further comments on reliability and power of significance tests

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Further comments on reliability and power of significance tests

Published Date

1993

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

The controversy about the relationship between reliability and the power of significance tests exists because statisticians obtain numerical solutions by varying independently the parameters of the power of statistical tests. In contrast, researchers have empirical limitations placed on them in varying the same parameters. Reliability and power can legitimately be decoupled by selection of the population from which to sample (Zimmerman & Williams, 1986), but this is an undependable way to increase power (Humphreys, 1991). Reducing population variance by selection of the sample can be considered a special case of (and a crude approximation to) the analysis of covariance, which is also a more effective way of controlling individual differences in true scores than the use of difference scores. Both the regressed differences and the raw differences are less reliable within treatments than their components, but can have more power in statistical tests. As the reliability of derived scores increases, however, power increases. Index terms: difference scores, error of measurement, planning experiments, power, reliability, significance tests, t tests, true scores.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Humphreys, Lloyd G. (1993). Further comments on reliability and power of significance tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 11-14. doi:10.1177/014662169301700102

Suggested citation

Humphreys, Lloyd G.. (1993). Further comments on reliability and power of significance tests. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/116223.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.