Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Kindergarten Program Choices: A Comparison of Full Day to Alternate Day Kindergarten Programs

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Kindergarten Program Choices: A Comparison of Full Day to Alternate Day Kindergarten Programs

Published Date

2010

Publisher

Type

Scholarly Text or Essay

Abstract

Parents may have as many as three choices for which type of kindergarten program to enroll their child. These choices include all-day every-day, alternate-day, or half day kindergarten. This paper compares the reasons that parents choose one program over another. Even though parents felt that the consistency of every-day kindergarten would be beneficial, seventy percent of alternate-day parents chose that program because the cost of all-day every-day was too high. Cost was the single most deciding factor for program choice.

Description

Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Education Degree in the College of Education and Human Service Professions, University of Minnesota Duluth, 2010
Committee names: Diane Rauschenfels (Chair), Randy Hyman. This item has been modified from the original to redact the signatures present.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

University of Minnesota Duluth. College of Education and Human Service Professions

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Brenner, Jill. (2010). Kindergarten Program Choices: A Comparison of Full Day to Alternate Day Kindergarten Programs. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/187519.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.