Can we pay people to act healthily? testing the relative effectiveness of incentive dimensions and underlying psychological mediators
2014-05
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Can we pay people to act healthily? testing the relative effectiveness of incentive dimensions and underlying psychological mediators
Authors
Published Date
2014-05
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
Offering financial incentives that are contingent upon the performance of a specified health behavior has emerged as a popular intervention strategy. However, the types of incentives that are most effective in changing behavior and the mechanisms through which these effects occur have not been identified. This study tests a theoretical framework that specifies two dimensions along which incentives may vary (reinforcement procedure: positive, negative; schedule: fixed, variable). Negative reinforcement was expected to be more effective than positive reinforcement because people are loss averse. Variable schedules were expected to be more effective than fixed schedules because they buffer against habituation to the incentive. A 5-week randomized controlled trial randomly assigned 153 participants to one of the four conditions that emerge when reinforcement procedure and schedule are crossed or a no-incentive control condition. Incentives were contingent upon meeting a specified walking goal. A host of psychological variables, including the perceived value of the incentive, were measured throughout the study so that mediation could be tested. Rates of walking were greater in the incentive conditions compared to control; the incentives did not differentially affect behavior. The perceived value of the incentive predicted behavior, but was not affected by the type of incentive. Walking rates dropped markedly during a 2-week follow-up. Future work should seek to definitively determine if the incentive categories differ from each other and continue to test mediational models. This study underscores the value of systematically and directly comparing theoretically grounded types of incentives and testing putative mediators that underlie the effect of specific types of incentives on behavior.
Keywords
Description
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. May 2014. Major: Psychology. Advisor: Alexander John Rothman. 1 computer file (PDF); vii, 160 pages, appendices 1-8.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Suggested citation
Burns, Rachel J. (2014). Can we pay people to act healthily? testing the relative effectiveness of incentive dimensions and underlying psychological mediators. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/163660.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.