Browsing by Subject "Policy implementation"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Delivering the ’D’ in transit-oriented development: Examining the town planning challenge(Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2012) Curtis, CareyThis paper examines the extent to which different town planning approaches succeed in implementing transit-oriented development (TOD). Of particular interest is the articulation of town planning policy through to implementation of development change on land around railway stations. A series of investigations include policy analysis and development mapping using Perth, Western Australia, as a case study. This research found that development change has been slow despite long policy lead times, and implementation has been inconsistent and patchy. Development planning for TOD has faltered, especially in relation to station precincts on new railways. Where development change has occurred, the greatest success has been through the use of public development agencies rather than through conventional planning approaches. Significant action in town planning is needed if development is to be delivered to a greater number of station precincts across the metropolitan area.Item From investigating to engaging families: examining the impact and implementation of family assessment response on racial equity in child welfare(2013-08) Semanchin Jones, Annette MarieAlmost half the states in the U.S. have implemented a differential response approach in child welfare with the goal of keeping children safer by better engaging and supporting families. The differential response track voluntarily engages low to moderate risk families by setting aside fault-finding. To explore yet unanswered questions about this growing approach, this study used sequential mixed methods to examine the implementation and impact of Minnesota's approach, called Family Assessment response. The first phase of the study used logistic regression to analyze administrative child welfare data for cases screened in between 2003 to 2010, to explore whether race was a predictor in these decision points: pathway assignment to either traditional investigation (TI) or family assessment (FA) response; switching pathway assignment from FA to TI; removal of children to out-of-home placement; and re-reporting to child protection within 12 months of case closing. The second phase used a comparative case study approach to explore implementation strategies that might help explain differences in outcomes by county. Data collection for this phase included semi-structured focus groups with workers and interviews with supervisors in the nine counties in the sample. Racial equity outcomes were mixed. Findings indicated that when controlling for poverty and other risk factors, African American, Native American and Multiracial children were less likely to be assigned to FA compared to Caucasian children for some, but not all years in the study timeframe. Disparities around pathway switch from family assessment to traditional investigation completely diminished over time. This study also found several key implementation strategies that were common in counties with positive outcomes, including effective integration of multiple family engaging and safety focused approaches; strong team cohesion to build capacity in family assessment; and a focus on engaging enduring supports for families. Findings of this study underscore the need for jurisdictions to have culturally responsive and financially-related resources to support families, with particular focus on continued resources after the pilot phase of implementation. This study also highlights the importance of applying a racial equity lens in examining new social policies and practices to ensure equitable implementation for all children and families.Item Maine anti-bullying law implementation in schools survey(2022-11-03) Ramirez, Marizen; Ryan, Andrew; mramirez@umn.edu; Ramirez, Marizen; University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health SciencesItem Using multi-criteria decision making to highlight stakeholders’ values in the corridor planning process(Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2011) Stich, Bethany; Holland, Joseph; Noberga, Rodrigo; O’Hara, CharlesThe processes for environmental review and public participation mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the 2005 Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) have become overly time- consuming and costly in transportation planning. This paper focuses on the implementation of transportation policy, highlighting how its complex nature challenges the traditional policy process theories. Federal and local perspectives are used as a basis for top-down and bottom- up implementation models. In addition, the authors discuss the conflicting nature of transportation policy implementation within decision processing and suggest an implementation tool that can aid transportation and planning professionals. The authors suggest that the use and integration of existing data from geospatial technologies and economic modeling can result in a visual Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model that can aid in streamlining and enhancing the NEPA process, agency coordination, and public participation in different administration levels.Item When ripples becomes waves : exploring the role of policy in the creation and coordination of citizen participation in Minnesota‟s water governance landscape.(2010-07) Steiger-Meister, KaitlinThe term "environmental governance" is used to describe the increasingly collaborative nature of environmental natural resource policy creation and implementation that incorporates a diversity of third party actors ranging from government agencies to the profit sector, nonprofit sector, and civic society. Though the definition of environmental governance emphasizes collaborative efforts that include citizen participants, there is still a lack of information examining what the citizen perspective and experience is in collaborative natural resource management activities. Moving away from an emphasis on the components of successful citizen groups, this project reframes the issue of creating and coordinating citizen participation as a function of the institutional arrangements in which they are situated. Specifically, this project examines how local governmental units created out of statutory law to address local fresh water resource management issues interact with federal, state, and county agencies working in the field of fresh water conservation. Special attention is given to Minnesota's Lake Improvement District program, one of the state's lesser known citizen-driven water resource management initiatives, to highlight barriers to citizen participation from a grassroots perspective. Using a qualitative case study approach that includes in-depth interviews with citizens, government officials, and agency representatives, this project seeks to develop environmental policies that better coordinate water management activities across varying spatial scales (local, regional, national). Project findings offer insight to policymakers regarding the potential institutional hurdles that may appear when attempting to implement citizen participation practices into a previously established water governance system.