Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

An Analysis of the Federal Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage. Book review of: The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law. By Andrew Koppelman

Strasser, Mark
2002
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

19_03_BR_Strasser.pdf (828.38 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/169395
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

An Analysis of the Federal Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage. Book review of: The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law. By Andrew Koppelman

Authors

Published Date

2002

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Type

Article

Abstract

Book review: The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law. By Andrew Koppelman. University of Chicago Press, 2002. Pp. 210. Reviewed by: Mark Strasser

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 19, Issue 3 (Winter 2002)

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 19, Number 3 (Winter 2002), pages 761-779

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Strasser, Mark. (2002). An Analysis of the Federal Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage. Book review of: The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law. By Andrew Koppelman. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/169395.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.