Comparing Properties of Alternative Media for Stormwater Biofilters

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Comparing Properties of Alternative Media for Stormwater Biofilters

Published Date

2017-05

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Abstract This study includes the classification and characterization of alternative biofiltration media. Materials were evaluated using a series of standardized tests. The performance and physical properties of alternative media were then compared to the currently specified biofiltration mixture of compost and sand. Results from laboratory testing reveal that compost and peat have similar physical properties and infiltrate and retain water at similar rates. Muck soils were found to be inferior to compost by the same performance criteria. These results indicate that peat soils may be a viable alternative to compost for use as a soil additive for biofiltration devices. This study also included the design of field test plots and the configuration of remote field monitoring equipment. The construction of six field test plots comparing compost and peat added as a soil amendment are described. Instrumentation was configured to collect long-term rainfall and water-storage data to evaluate performance in-situ.

Description

University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. May 2017. Major: Civil Engineering. Advisors: David Saftner, Rebecca Teasley. 1 computer file (PDF); viii, 89 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Swanson, Joshua. (2017). Comparing Properties of Alternative Media for Stormwater Biofilters. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/188758.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.