Comparing Properties of Alternative Media for Stormwater Biofilters
2017-05
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Comparing Properties of Alternative Media for Stormwater Biofilters
Authors
Published Date
2017-05
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
Abstract This study includes the classification and characterization of alternative biofiltration media. Materials were evaluated using a series of standardized tests. The performance and physical properties of alternative media were then compared to the currently specified biofiltration mixture of compost and sand. Results from laboratory testing reveal that compost and peat have similar physical properties and infiltrate and retain water at similar rates. Muck soils were found to be inferior to compost by the same performance criteria. These results indicate that peat soils may be a viable alternative to compost for use as a soil additive for biofiltration devices. This study also included the design of field test plots and the configuration of remote field monitoring equipment. The construction of six field test plots comparing compost and peat added as a soil amendment are described. Instrumentation was configured to collect long-term rainfall and water-storage data to evaluate performance in-situ.
Description
University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. May 2017. Major: Civil Engineering. Advisors: David Saftner, Rebecca Teasley. 1 computer file (PDF); viii, 89 pages.
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Swanson, Joshua. (2017). Comparing Properties of Alternative Media for Stormwater Biofilters. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/188758.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.