Quick/cheaper stand assessments.
1999-10
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Quick/cheaper stand assessments.
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1999-10
Publisher
University of Minnesota
Type
Report
Abstract
Sampling and measurement techniques exist for reducing the effort/cost associated with standard timber stand assessments depending on the quantities of interest as well as the volume table(s) being used. This paper will introduce and consider the application of standard variable-radius plot sampling, double (two-phase) sampling, a new technique called Big-BAF sampling, and assorted shortcut measurement and observation techniques as they apply to Lake States forestry practice. The relative efficiencies of the techniques are also discussed. The paper is written for individuals who supervise or plan or conduct timber stand assessments for their organization. A basic understanding of the conduct of timber stand assessments using standard methods (e.g. line-plot cruises) is assumed. The paper could be the basis for a short course; hands-on activities, including a field exercise, are suggested. Spreadsheet code implementing many of the calculations presented in the paper is also available.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
139
Funding information
Research supported by Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station project 042-44. Published as paper no. 994420139 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Burk, Thomas E.. (1999). Quick/cheaper stand assessments.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/36993.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.