Agenda-setting and mathematically predictable mass behavior.

Loading...

View/Download File

Massart_Caitlin_May2010.pdf (445 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/93217

Statistics

View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Agenda-setting and mathematically predictable mass behavior.

Authors

Massart, Caitlin Anne

Published Date

2010-05

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Agenda-setting, or the influence of media on public perception, has been the focus of numerous studies over the past three decades (Bryant & Zillman, 2002; Lowery & DeFleur, 1995). Although these studies vary in methodological and ideological approach, there is strong support for the agenda-setting influence of news media, especially over extended periods of time (Bryant & Zillman, 2002; Funkhouser, 1973; Zhu, 1992). However, correlation strengths between media and public agendas in studies range from .05 to .967 (in the most extreme cases, with the majority falling closer to an average influence range of .35-.8) (Wanta & Ghanem, 2007), and some have argued that these correlation differences are evidence of a flaw in agenda-setting theory (McLeod, 1974). Correlation variations do not, however, necessarily contradict agenda-setting theory but may instead be the natural variation resulting from a dynamic process between the media and the public, where information is acquired, absorbed and organized by individuals, and then used to seek out and organize further information. Originally a simple prediction of correlation between the news media and public issue salience, agenda-setting has evolved to include a myriad of variables dealing with the ‘discrepancies’ of human behavior (McCombs, 2005; Wanta & Ghanem, 2007). Human behavior is not perhaps as simple as predicting the movement of particles, largely due to a phenomenon commonly known as free will (Ball, 2004; Dalton, Beck, Heckfedldt & Koetzle, 1998). It is, however, predictable, because even pure randomness – either in particles or in human behavior - gives way to determinism if the number of random events is large, as individual will is submerged by the constraints of society (Ball, 2004). The means to predict mass behavior is already available in existing agenda-setting studies. Theoretically, by looking at existing agenda-setting studies and understanding the conditions under which different correlation strengths occur, it should be possible to extract patterns of behavior, extrapolate the influence of variables on the relationship between the media and the public, and effectively predict varying correlation strengths of different studies according to their situational conditions.

Keywords

News media

Public perception

Free will

Media and the public

Mass Communication

Description

University of Minnesota M.A. thesis. May 2010. Major: Mass Communication. Advisor: Brian Southwell. 1 computer file (PDF); vii, 65 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Master's Theses (Plan A and Professional Engineering Design Projects)

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Massart, Caitlin Anne. (2010). Agenda-setting and mathematically predictable mass behavior.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/93217.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.