A Comparison of the Genetic Algorithm and the Mixing Genetic Algorithm
Gulfam, Muhammad
2020-07
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
A Comparison of the Genetic Algorithm and the Mixing Genetic Algorithm
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2020-07
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
Genetic Algorithms (GAs) are optimization techniques inspired by the idea of evolution. They can sometimes take a long time to find the solution to a problem, but it is not always obvious when, or how to configure their various parameters. Recently, a new GA was introduced [8] that has a lot of potential for parallelization. This algorithm, called the Mixing Genetic Algorithm, has shown promising results on the well-known Traveling Salesman Problem. In this work, we have compared the effectiveness of the Mixing GA over a traditional GA on three discrete optimization problems: the OneMax problem and two topologies of the Ising Model (Ising Model on Tree and Ising Model on Ring). The comparison has been done for the success rate at the given time, for the given problem size and size of population. The comparison has been done for, both, serial and parallel implementations. Overall, the success rate for the Mixing GA is better than the traditional GA. We have also compared two population selection methods, namely, tournament selection and generational population selection. The tournament selection outperformed generational population selection for all the problems and problem sizes that we experimented with.
Description
University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. 2020. Major: Computer Science. Advisor: Andrew Sutton. 1 computer file (PDF); 93 pages.
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Gulfam, Muhammad. (2020). A Comparison of the Genetic Algorithm and the Mixing Genetic Algorithm. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/216308.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.