Demarcation and Definition: The Metaphysics of Projects and Their Management Considered

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Demarcation and Definition: The Metaphysics of Projects and Their Management Considered

Published Date

2020-05

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

The philosophy of project management is largely uncharted territory. Although the possibility of it being a distinct area of inquiry has been suggested before now, it has not yet formally taken shape as such. Several years ago, discussions were had among academicians and professionals within project management circles regarding the relevance and applicability of philosophy to their craft, but philosophers themselves have yet to weigh in on any of it. Taking the proposal of J. Davidson Frame in his paper “Philosophy of Project Management: Lessons From the Philosophy of Science” as a starting point, I have proceeded into the current void to consider questions of project ontology and demarcation, present a novel theory of projects (Propositional Theory), and analyze common reasons for project failure. Beyond my own theorizing, my aim is to clear ground, as it were, to accommodate and encourage further debate in the interest of developing the philosophy of project management into a new area of applied philosophy.

Description

University of Minnesota M.A. thesis. May 2020. Major: Philosophy. Advisor: Peter Hanks. 1 computer file (PDF); ii, 84 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Tebbitt, Brian. (2020). Demarcation and Definition: The Metaphysics of Projects and Their Management Considered. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/259600.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.