Between Dec 22, 2025 and Jan 5, 2026, items can be submitted to the UDC and DRUM, but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs for datasets until after Jan 5. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Figshare, Zenodo, Open Science Framework, Harvard Dataverse or OpenICPSR.

Land-Use Annual Report 2011

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Published Date

Publisher

Type

Abstract

This report summarizes planning and zoning actions carried out in St. Louis County in 2010. Of the total approved permits in 2010, 53% were shoreland-related and 47% were non-shoreland. In 2010, there were 339 approved shoreland permits. From 2008-2010, St. Louis County averaged 373 approved shoreland permits per year in county administered areas. Recreational Development lakes had the most permit activity in 2010 with 190 approved permits, and the most permit activity from 2008-2010 with 612 approved permits. General Development lakes had the second most permit activity in 2010 with 75 approved permits, and the second most permit activity from 2008-2010 with 262 approved permits. Natural Environment lakes had 41 approved permits in 2010 and a 2008-2010 total of 103 approved permits.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

St. Louis County Planning Department. (2011). Land-Use Annual Report 2011. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/189281.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.