Disputed Elections: What Can the Nation Learn from Minnesota?
2012-04-24
Loading...
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Disputed Elections: What Can the Nation Learn from Minnesota?
Authors
Published Date
2012-04-24
Publisher
Type
Presentation
Abstract
Keywords
Description
In the wake of the controversial 2000 presidential election — and high-profile close elections like those in 2008 and 2010 in Minnesota — scholars and practitioners alike are examining how states can best handle the challenges of disputed elections. Political considerations often get top billing, but the legal questions presented are often the most difficult to resolve. Add the fact that new technology and procedures are reshaping elections across the country and it becomes clear that the nation needs to think hard — and well in advance — how to resolve disputes about who actually won an election.
PANELISTS INCLUDE:
Ned Foley, Ohio State Moritz College of Law professor and Reporter for the ALI project
Rachel Smith, Hennepin County Election Director
Eric Magnuson, attorney/former Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice
David Lillehaug, attorney at Fredrikson & Byron/ attorney for Al Franken and Mark Dayton
Moderators:
Doug Chapin, Center for the Study of Politics and Governance
John Fortier, Bipartisan Policy Center
The event is co-sponsored by the Bipartisan Policy Center. The Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) drives principled solutions through rigorous analysis, reasoned negotiation, and respectful dialogue. Founded in 2007 by former Senate Majority Leaders Howard Baker, Tom Daschle, Bob Dole and George Mitchell, BPC combines politically-balanced policymaking with strong, proactive advocacy and outreach.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2012). Disputed Elections: What Can the Nation Learn from Minnesota?. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217698.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.