Disputed Elections: What Can the Nation Learn from Minnesota?

Title

Disputed Elections: What Can the Nation Learn from Minnesota?

Published Date

2012-04-24

Publisher

Type

Presentation

Abstract

Keywords

Description

In the wake of the controversial 2000 presidential election — and high-profile close elections like those in 2008 and 2010 in Minnesota — scholars and practitioners alike are examining how states can best handle the challenges of disputed elections. Political considerations often get top billing, but the legal questions presented are often the most difficult to resolve. Add the fact that new technology and procedures are reshaping elections across the country and it becomes clear that the nation needs to think hard — and well in advance — how to resolve disputes about who actually won an election. PANELISTS INCLUDE: Ned Foley, Ohio State Moritz College of Law professor and Reporter for the ALI project Rachel Smith, Hennepin County Election Director Eric Magnuson, attorney/former Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice David Lillehaug, attorney at Fredrikson & Byron/ attorney for Al Franken and Mark Dayton Moderators: Doug Chapin, Center for the Study of Politics and Governance John Fortier, Bipartisan Policy Center The event is co-sponsored by the Bipartisan Policy Center. The Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) drives principled solutions through rigorous analysis, reasoned negotiation, and respectful dialogue. Founded in 2007 by former Senate Majority Leaders Howard Baker, Tom Daschle, Bob Dole and George Mitchell, BPC combines politically-balanced policymaking with strong, proactive advocacy and outreach.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2012). Disputed Elections: What Can the Nation Learn from Minnesota?. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217698.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.