Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Keeping Legal History "Legal" and Judicial Activism in Perspective: A Reply to Richard Pildes

Heckman, Charles A.
2002
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

19_03_Heckman.pdf (802.58 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/169399
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Keeping Legal History "Legal" and Judicial Activism in Perspective: A Reply to Richard Pildes

Authors

Published Date

2002

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Type

Article

Abstract

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 19, Issue 3 (Winter 2002)

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 19, Number 3 (Winter 2002), pages 625-644

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Heckman, Charles A.. (2002). Keeping Legal History "Legal" and Judicial Activism in Perspective: A Reply to Richard Pildes. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/169399.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.