Differences in Particulate Matter (Dust) Between Non-modified and Light-Modified (170°C) Wood Species
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Differences in Particulate Matter (Dust) Between Non-modified and Light-Modified (170°C) Wood Species
Published Date
2018-11-12
Publisher
University of Minnesota Duluth
Type
Technical Report
Abstract
There has been much speculation on whether the practice of heat modification of various wood species has a direct effect on the dust created when these woods are machined. An initial study was initiated to compare non-modified wood species with their lightly modified (170 °C) counterparts, specifically as a gravimetric characterization of the wood particulate matter (PM) generated through typical cutting practices. Five different species were compared, including: Yellow Poplar, Red Maple, White Ash, Aspen and Balsam Fir. Aerosol wood PM sampling was conducted at the Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) as collaboration between the Wood Utilization Materials & Bio-Economy (Wood Group) and the Mineral/Materials Characterization Group, a sub-group within the Minerals – Metallurgy - Mining (M3) NRRI Initiative Group. The study was designed primarily as a first-pass analysis in which size-fractionated sampling, based on aerodynamic diameter of the dust particles, was utilized to evaluate if there were any dramatic differences between the non-modified and light modified (170 °C) wood species.
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
NRRI Technical Report;NRRI/TR-2018/46
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Aro, Matthew D; Monson Geerts, Stephen D; French, Suzanne; Cai, Meijun. (2018). Differences in Particulate Matter (Dust) Between Non-modified and Light-Modified (170°C) Wood Species. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/204303.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.