Differences in Particulate Matter (Dust) Between Non-modified and Light-Modified (170°C) Wood Species

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Differences in Particulate Matter (Dust) Between Non-modified and Light-Modified (170°C) Wood Species

Published Date

2018-11-12

Publisher

University of Minnesota Duluth

Type

Technical Report

Abstract

There has been much speculation on whether the practice of heat modification of various wood species has a direct effect on the dust created when these woods are machined. An initial study was initiated to compare non-modified wood species with their lightly modified (170 °C) counterparts, specifically as a gravimetric characterization of the wood particulate matter (PM) generated through typical cutting practices. Five different species were compared, including: Yellow Poplar, Red Maple, White Ash, Aspen and Balsam Fir. Aerosol wood PM sampling was conducted at the Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) as collaboration between the Wood Utilization Materials & Bio-Economy (Wood Group) and the Mineral/Materials Characterization Group, a sub-group within the Minerals – Metallurgy - Mining (M3) NRRI Initiative Group. The study was designed primarily as a first-pass analysis in which size-fractionated sampling, based on aerodynamic diameter of the dust particles, was utilized to evaluate if there were any dramatic differences between the non-modified and light modified (170 °C) wood species.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

NRRI Technical Report;NRRI/TR-2018/46

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Aro, Matthew D; Monson Geerts, Stephen D; French, Suzanne; Cai, Meijun. (2018). Differences in Particulate Matter (Dust) Between Non-modified and Light-Modified (170°C) Wood Species. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/204303.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.