The Effects of Different End Anchors on Satiety Scales

2009-04-08
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Effects of Different End Anchors on Satiety Scales

Published Date

2009-04-08

Publisher

Type

Presentation

Abstract

Two scales that measure hunger and fullness were compared in this study, the Satiety Labeled Intensity Magnitude (SLIM) scale and the General Labeled Magnitude Scale (GLMS). The scales differed in terms used to define satiety and their end points. The research looked at which scale was more effective and the effect of varying end anchors. To determine which scale was best, 40 volunteers came in three times and ate three snacks differing in caloric value. Each volunteer rated their hunger and fullness before and after each snack. Twenty volunteers used the SLIM scale and the other twenty used the GLMS. Analysis shows one scale was not superior to another, but the end anchors did affect how hunger and fullness were rated. The GLMS gave much more condensed data, and overall fullness was more affected than hunger.

Description

Additional contributor: Zata Vickers (faculty mentor).

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Long, Alexis. (2009). The Effects of Different End Anchors on Satiety Scales. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/50141.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.