Accessibility and the choice of network investments in the London Underground

Levinson, David M.
Giacomin, David
Badsey-Ellis, Antony
2016
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

JTLU_vol9no1_pp.131-150.pdf (2.71 MB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/181576
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Accessibility and the choice of network investments in the London Underground

Authors

Published Date

2016

Publisher

Journal of Transport and Land Use

Type

Article

Abstract

In 1863, the Metropolitan Railway of what came to be known as the London Underground successfully opened as the world's first subway. Its high ridership spawned interest in additional links. Entrepreneurs secured funding and then proposed new lines to Parliament for approval, though only some were actually approved. While putative rail barons may have conducted some economic analysis, the final decision lay with Parliament, which did not have modern transportation, economic, or geographic analysis tools available. How good were the decisions that Parliament made in approving Underground lines? This paper explores the role accessibility played in the decision to approve or reject proposed early London Tube schemes. It finds that maximizing accessibility to population (highly correlated with revenue and ridership) per expenditure largely explains Parliamentary approvals and rejections.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

JTLU Volume 9, No. 1 (2016)

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

10.5198/jtlu.2015.797

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Levinson, David M.; Giacomin, David; Badsey-Ellis, Antony. (2016). Accessibility and the choice of network investments in the London Underground. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, 10.5198/jtlu.2015.797.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.