Political disagreement and decision-making in American politics

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Political disagreement and decision-making in American politics

Published Date

2013-06

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

This dissertation explores how political disagreement and disagreeable information shape the nature and quality of citizens' political judgments. People encounter disagreeable information on a routine basis, yet little is known about how exposure to this kind of information shapes people's political decision-making. I examine if and when exposure to political disagreement and disagreeable information leads people to make open-minded, accurate political judgments rather than closed minded, biased decisions. Using a series of experiments, I demonstrate that exposure to high levels of political disagreement can shape how people make judgments, and that, at times, it leads people to be more open-minded and accurate in their approach to decision-making. This research has important implications for understanding how inherent features of the democratic process shape the quality of citizens' judgments.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2013. Major: Political Science. Advisor:Joanne M. Miller. 1 computer file (PDF); x, 230 pages, appendix A.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Sheagley, Geoffrey David. (2013). Political disagreement and decision-making in American politics. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/156227.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.