Single-member districts are not constitutionally required

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Published Date

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Abstract

Keywords

Description

1 online resource (PDF, pages 261-290)

Related to

item.page.replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding Information

item.page.isbn

DOI identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 33, Number 2 (Summer 2018), pages 261-290

Other identifiers

Suggested Citation

Ross, Robert E.; Anderson, Barrett. (2018). Single-member districts are not constitutionally required. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/198274.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.