Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

What differentiates a fluent reader from a non-fluent reader and how should we assess it: implications for the classroom.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

What differentiates a fluent reader from a non-fluent reader and how should we assess it: implications for the classroom.

Published Date

2011-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Assessing Reading Fluency There were three questions being asked: 1) Does an adjusted words per minute score measure reading fluency, 2) Is an adjusted words per minute score predictive of reading fluency, and 3) What characteristics distinguish a fluent reader from a non-fluent reader? There were two studies conducted to address these concerns. Study 1 consisted of sixty college students and Study 2 consisted of twenty-three second graders, twenty-five fourth graders, and twenty-one sixth graders. It was found that an adjusted word per minute score on the oral reading assessment was neither correlated with nor predictive of reading fluency, for either study. With regard to distinguishing characteristics, there were no consistently significant findings other than accuracy between fluent and non-fluent second graders on the open-maze sentence and paragraph delivered sentence-by-sentence assessments. The fact that the results were mixed with regard to reading speed and accuracy being distinguishing factors between fluent and non-fluent readers on the oral reading assessment, and the fact that, the results were also mixed with regard to the Lexical Decision Task should make one wonder if perhaps reading speed and accuracy are actually natural by-products of maturation and not necessarily secondary characteristics of reading fluency. Assessing Reading Fluency These findings lend credence to the theory that current intervention practices in the schools may be teaching our students to ―bark‖ at text. They also lend credence to the idea that there may be a third pathway for processing words/text, a pathway that contains a semantic module that isn‘t quite fully developed and is in fact in the learning process. Finally, the findings also support the idea that development of gist in the phonological store may depend on a student‘s ability to metacognitively monitor their reading to the point of being able to retain more appropriate gist of sentences rather than trying to rehearse a complete replication of the whole sentence. To this end, it was proposed that a longitudinal (mixed methods) study be performed to assess these qualities.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. December 2011. Major: Educational Psychology. Advisors:Dr. S. Jay Samuels, Dr. Mark L. Davison. 1 computer file (PDF); xviii, 270 pages, appendices A-N.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Alt, Shirley Jean. (2011). What differentiates a fluent reader from a non-fluent reader and how should we assess it: implications for the classroom.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/119678.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.