Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

The Cognitive Consequences of Childhood Adversity: An Investigation of Feedback Learning Strategies and the Sensitized-Specialization Hypothesis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Cognitive Consequences of Childhood Adversity: An Investigation of Feedback Learning Strategies and the Sensitized-Specialization Hypothesis

Published Date

2019-07

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Stressful environments have a profound impact on children. The prevailing view is that adverse experiences in childhood impairs the mind and derails development. In contrast, the current research draws on the specialization hypothesis, which proposes that children should develop specialized cognitive abilities that are adapted to adverse environments. This view focuses on the strengths of people who have experienced adversity instead of exclusively on their weaknesses. In this dissertation, I test how different learning abilities might be enhanced by exposure to early adversity. I conducted four experimental tests of this hypothesis in relation to reversal learning performance, examining how growing up in unpredictable versus predictable environments are associated with different learning strategies. I hypothesize that growing up in a more predictable environment should be associated with the use of learning strategies that integrate information over longer periods of time, whereas growing up in a more unpredictable environment should be associated with learning strategies that rely on recent information. Furthermore, based on previous studies, I hypothesize that such learning strategies should be activated by the threat of uncertainty in the current environment. Across 4 experiments, I tested how exposure to childhood unpredictability impacts both overall reversal learning performance and trial-by-trial learning styles and tested whether current, experimentally manipulated cues of economic uncertainty modulated reversal learning outcomes. Findings were mixed and inconsistent. On average, overall indicators of reversal learning performance seem to be impaired by exposure to greater childhood unpredictability. For trial-by-trial learning performance, there were some main effects of childhood unpredictability, but they were inconsistent across experiments. Finally, for all outcomes and experiments, the current context did not moderate the effect of early childhood. I discuss possible explanations for these inconsistent findings and lay out new avenues for future research. Despite these inconsistent findings, this research remains important because it could help to identify the types of learning strategies that are most effective for success among people from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. July 2019. Major: Psychology. Advisor: Jeffry Simpson. 1 computer file (PDF); vii, 71 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Young, Ethan. (2019). The Cognitive Consequences of Childhood Adversity: An Investigation of Feedback Learning Strategies and the Sensitized-Specialization Hypothesis. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/206659.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.