Circuity in Urban Transit Networks
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Circuity in Urban Transit Networks
Authors
Published Date
2015
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
This paper investigates the circuity of transit networks and examines auto mode share as a function of circuity and accessibility to better understand the performance of urban transit systems. We first survey transit circuity in the Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota, region in detail, comparing auto and transit trips. This paper finds that circuity can help to explain mode choices of commuters. We then investigate thirty-five additional metropolitan areas in the United States. The results from these areas show that transit circuity exponentially declines as travel time increases. Moreover, we find that the circuity of transit networks is higher than that of road networks, illustrating how transit systems choose to expand their spatial coverage at the expense of directness and efficiency in public transportation networks. This paper performs a regression analysis that suggests the circuity of transportation networks can estimate transit accessibility, which helps to explain mode share.
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.09.004
Previously Published Citation
Huang, Jie and David Levinson (2015) Circuity in Urban Transit Networks. Journal of Transport Geography 48 145-153
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Huang, Jie; Levinson, David M. (2015). Circuity in Urban Transit Networks. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.09.004.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.