Patrick Hastings' 2022 Guidebook on James Joyce's Ulysses (1922), and Walter J. Ong's Thought
2022-03
No Thumbnail Available
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Patrick Hastings' 2022 Guidebook on James Joyce's Ulysses (1922), and Walter J. Ong's Thought
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2022-03
Publisher
This version was not previously published.
Type
Scholarly Text or Essay
Abstract
In my 3,175-word review essay "Patrick Hastings' 2022 Guidebook on James Joyce's Ulysses (1922), and Walter J. Ong's Thought," I first highlight Patrick Hastings' new 2022 320-page book The Guide to James Joyce's "Ulysses" (Johns Hopkins University Press), published to commemorate the centenary of the publication of Joyce's experimental novel Ulysses in 1922. Then I concentrate on what Hastings and certain Joyce scholars refer to as the retrospectivity in Ulysses. Next, I highlight the American Jesuit literary scholar and media ecology theorist Walter J. Ong's seminal essay on literary retrospectivity in his 1977 book Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture (Cornell University Press, pp. 230-277), certain points of which I recount in detail.
Description
See the above abstract.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
N/A;N/A
Funding information
N/A
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
This version was not previously published.
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Farrell, Thomas. (2022). Patrick Hastings' 2022 Guidebook on James Joyce's Ulysses (1922), and Walter J. Ong's Thought. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/226701.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.