A Geomorphologic Study of River basins and Hydrologic Response
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
A Geomorphologic Study of River basins and Hydrologic Response
Alternative title
Published Date
1992-06
Publisher
St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory
Type
Report
Abstract
It has long been recognized that catchment geomorphology relationships can be
used as predictors of catchment flood characteristics. These geomorphologic relationships
can be determined for river networks which have been automatically extracted
from digital elevation data. If scaling properties exist in a catchment or river network
then laws which hold at one scale (for example, basins with horizontal length scale
of 1 kilometer) can be extrapolated with appropriate scaling to other scales (such as
basins with horizontal length scales of tens of kilometers). This research has examined
several basins for the purpose of (1) differentiating between the hillslope and channel
scales from digital elevation data, and (2) identifying the presence of scaling in river
networks and estimating the scaling laws. The ultimate goal of such research is to
relate the findings about scaling in river networks to measures of hydrologic response
of the river basin.
There is evidence that river networks are fractals which means that small basins,
such as subbasins of a larger basin, have statistically similar structure with larger
basins. Two methods were used to estimate the fractal dimensions of the terrain
surface and the river networks: (1) the variation method, and (2) the box-counting
method. Artificial river networks were generated from Iterated Function Systems (IFS)
for verification of the box-counting results. Neither ofthe two methods for determining
the fractal dimension of a surface were capable of predicting the breakpoint between the
hillslope and channel scales, at least from the resolution at which the digital elevation
data were available for this study.
The fractal dimension of the branching structure of a river network can be expressed
as 10gRB/logRL (where RB and RL are Horton's bifurcation and length ratios) which
is equivalent to the fractal dimension of the river network when individual streams
have a fractal dimension of unity. In this research we investigated the reliability of
estimating the fractal dimension of river networks based on Horton's ratios RB and
RL as opposed to estimation from indirect methods such as the box-counting method.
It was found that Horton's ratios can be difficult to estimate, and that they remain
constant when the threshold area defining the network sources is varied and when the
resolution of the digital elevation data is varied. For the two river networks studied
(the fractal dimensions of individual streams in both networks were unity) the boxcounting
method was shown to be in agreement with the fractal dimension of the
branching structure estimated from Horton's ratios.
Future research should address the following two problems: (1) Determination of
the hillslope scale from morphometric properties of the river network based on the
assumption that threshold area does not remain constant over the basin but changes
with local slope, and (2) Exploration of Diffusion Limited Aggregation (DLA) models
for studying the evolution and structure of river networks and their hydrologic response.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Project Reports
330
330
Funding information
Minnesota Water Resources Research Center
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Helmlinger, Keith R.; Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi. (1992). A Geomorphologic Study of River basins and Hydrologic Response. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/108661.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.