Non-Ideal Autonomy in Relationships of Care

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Non-Ideal Autonomy in Relationships of Care

Published Date

2017-08

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

In​​ ​​moral​​ ​​and​​ ​​political​​ ​​philosophy,​​ ​​autonomy​​ ​​is​​ ​​generally​​ ​​theorized​​ ​​as​​ ​​a​​ ​​right​​ ​​exercised​​ ​​by independent,​​ ​​self-reflective,​​ ​​rational,​​ ​​adult​​ ​​persons.​​ ​​Feminist​​ ​​philosophers​​ ​​have challenged​​ ​​this​​ ​​picture​​ ​​by​​ ​​emphasizing​​ ​that​ ​​critical​​ ​​reflection​​ ​​as​ ​well​ ​as​ ​​relationships​​ ​​and​ ​dependencies​ ​​are​​ ​​integral​​ ​​to​​ ​​what​​ ​​it​​ ​​means​​ ​​to​​ ​​exercise​ ​autonomy.​​ ​​This​​ ​​work​​ ​​addresses​​ ​​the​ ​implications​​ ​​of​​ ​necessitating​ ​cognitive​ ​processes​ ​such​ ​as​ ​critical​ ​reflection​ ​for​ ​autonomy in​ ​legal​ ​guardianships.​ In​​ ​​a​​ ​​guardianship,​​ ​​a​​ ​​court​​ ​​determines​​ ​​that​​ ​​a​​ ​​person​ ​(i.e.,​​ ​​the​​ ​​ward)​​ ​​is​​ ​​‘incapable’​​ ​​of​​ ​​legal​ ​decision-making​​ ​​and​​ ​​appoints​​ ​​someone​​ ​​else​​ ​​(i.e.,​ ​the​​ ​​guardian)​​ ​​to​​ ​​make​​ ​​decisions​​ ​​on​​ ​​her​ ​behalf.​​ ​​This​​ ​​is​​ ​​problematic​​ ​​because​​ ​​a​ ​state​ ​bill​ ​of​ ​rights​ ​statute​ ​may​ ​simultaneously require​ ​​that​ ​​a​ ​​ward’s​​ ​​autonomy​ ​​be​​ ​​respected​ ​by​ ​the​ ​guardian.​​ ​​Here,​​ ​​there​​ ​​is​​ ​​a​​ ​​gap ​between​​ ​​our​​ ​​philosophical​​ ​​conceptions​​ ​​of​ ​autonomy​​ ​​and​​ ​​how​​ ​​real​​ ​​cognitively​​ ​​diverse​ ​people​​ ​​experience​​ ​​it.​​ ​​In​​ ​​response​ ​to​ ​this​ ​gap,​ ​a​​ ​​non-ideal​​ ​​approach​​ ​​treats​​ ​​autonomy​​ ​​as​​ ​​a​ ​fundamental​​ ​​need​​ ​​rather​​ ​​than​​ ​​a​​ ​​right,​ ​suspends​​ ​​cognitive​​ ​​ideals​​ ​​and​​ ​​instead​​ ​​attends​​ ​​to​ ​diverse​​ ​experiences​ ​of​​ ​​it.​​ ​Approaching​ ​autonomy​ ​in​ ​this​ ​way​ ​has​​ ​​the​​ ​​potential​​ ​​to​​ ​​more​ ​meaningfully​​ ​​inform​​ ​​expectations​​ ​​of​​ ​​care​​ ​​within​ ​legal​​ ​​guardianships.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. August 2017. Major: Philosophy. Advisors: Joan Tronto, Sarah Holtman. 1 computer file (PDF); iii, 174 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Swanson, Kathryn. (2017). Non-Ideal Autonomy in Relationships of Care. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/191434.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.