Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Wearable Textile-Based Contact Sensing for Functional Fit Assessment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Wearable Textile-Based Contact Sensing for Functional Fit Assessment

Published Date

2021-08

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Fit of a wearable system influences many human factors, including comfort, performance, and risk of injury. Sensors can provide objective and quantitative measures of mechanical interactions between the body and the wearable system for functional fit assessment. However, accurate on-body sensing is a challenge due to contaminating variables that can affect accuracy, including forces introduced by garment/body interactions such as stretching and folding. Contact sensing is a simpler sensing approach that is less susceptible to on-body contaminating variables. However, there is currently no gold-standard reference measure for on-body contact measurement. Here, multiple imperfect sources of information are compared and their respective limitations contrasted. This research focuses on evaluating methods to quantify functional fit of a wearable system by measuring contact between the body and a spacesuit component mockup during controlled robotic manikin testing through a wearable contact and force sensing e-textile garment. This study compared two sensor-based fit quantification methods (contact and force sensors) with a non-wearable reference (optical Motion Capture (MoCap)). Garment-integrated sensors were characterized in a bench test apparatus (Instron) under controlled loading conditions. The translation of these methods to the wearable environment was investigated using a robotic manikin that performs repeatable dynamic movements for a controlled on-body sensing scenario. Two different manikin conditions were evaluated to simulate effects of anthropometric differences. Under controlled conditions, contact sensors showed some hysteresis and generally exhibited higher closing forces compared to opening forces. Using the threshold calibration model, contact sensors accurately measured contacts above about 0.5 N, but recorded intermittent false negative contacts between approximately 0-0.5 N. Force sensors reliably measured contacts above 0.15 N and comparatively recorded a smaller range of false negatives between 0-0.15 N, but a much larger proportion of false positives. However, under on-body conditions, the contact-threshold calibration did not accurately translate for force sensors. There were no strong similarities found between contact sensor, force sensor, and MoCap marker data. Force sensors were difficult to calibrate and sensitive to factors like donning forces, movement, and wrinkling. Contact sensors were influenced by fewer and more resolvable contaminating variables, and were found to be better suited for on-body applications.

Keywords

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. 2021. Major: Design. Advisor: Lucy Dunne. 1 computer file (PDF); xxii, 244 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Compton, Crystal. (2021). Wearable Textile-Based Contact Sensing for Functional Fit Assessment. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/225038.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.