The Demand for Insurance: Expected Utility Theory from a Gain Perspective

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Demand for Insurance: Expected Utility Theory from a Gain Perspective

Published Date

2001-07

Publisher

Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Minnesota

Type

Working Paper

Abstract

Expected utility theory holds that the demand for insurance is a demand for certainty, because under the conventional specification of the theory, it appears as if buyers of insurance prefer certain losses to actuarially equivalent uncertain ones. Empirical studies, however, show that individuals actually prefer uncertain losses to actuarially equivalent certain ones. This paper attempts to reconcile expected utility theory with this empirical evidence by suggesting that insurance is demanded to obtain an income payoff in the "bad" state. This specification is mathematically equivalent to the conventional specification and consistent with this and other empirical evidence, but it implies that the demand for insurance has nothing to do with demand for certainty.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Nyman, J.A., (2001), "The Demand for Insurance: Expected Utility Theory from a Gain Perspective", Discussion Paper No. 313, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Minnesota.

Suggested citation

Nyman, John A.. (2001). The Demand for Insurance: Expected Utility Theory from a Gain Perspective. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/55880.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.