A COMPARISON OF SMALL MAMMAL DIVERSITY IN FORESTED HABITATS TO PRAIRIE HABITATS

2011-02-09
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

A COMPARISON OF SMALL MAMMAL DIVERSITY IN FORESTED HABITATS TO PRAIRIE HABITATS

Authors

Published Date

2011-02-09

Publisher

Type

Scholarly Text or Essay

Abstract

This report, in its attempt to understand diversity, will focus on small mammals found within and close to Itasca State Park, Minnesota. The two types of habitat that were used to collect our data and to conduct our comparison included forested habitats and prairie habitats. Within the forested habitats, we had a variety of smaller biomes: burned deciduous forest, unburned deciduous forest, burned red pine forest, unburned red pine forest, aspen forest, and bog. As for the prairie habitats, it was harder to get an array of smaller biomes; therefore, we divided this habitat type by region, giving us Rush South, Rush North, Coburn East, Coburn West, Waubun Wet, and Waubun Dry. The questions we hoped to answer in this experiment were as followed: 1) Which communities, inside forest sites or the prairie sites, have more species? 2) Are there any common species to both locations? and 3) To what attributes can we see similarities or differences?

Description

Student paper, EEB 4839, 2010

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Itasca Biological Station Student Papers

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Vang, Na. (2011). A COMPARISON OF SMALL MAMMAL DIVERSITY IN FORESTED HABITATS TO PRAIRIE HABITATS. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99971.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.