The Admission of Scientific Evidence in a Post-Crawford World



The Admission of Scientific Evidence in a Post-Crawford World

Published Date



Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology




The goal of this Note is to evaluate the requirements for admitting scientific evidence in criminal cases. Part I discusses Confrontation Clause case law since Ohio v. Roberts, ex-amines the standards for the admission of scientific evidence, and considers the weaknesses of cross-examination and eye-witness testimony. Part II discusses actions that can be taken to improve the quality of scientific information available to defense attorneys, prosecutors, the courts, and the public. This Note concludes that holding scientific evidence to the Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharmacueticals, Inc. standard, coupled with public disclosure, facilitates the just and effective operation of our criminal justice system.


Related to



Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

14 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 951

Suggested citation

Nielson, Eric. (2013). The Admission of Scientific Evidence in a Post-Crawford World. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy,

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.