Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

A mixed methods approach to understanding weight-related behavioral disparities among college students by sexual orientation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

A mixed methods approach to understanding weight-related behavioral disparities among college students by sexual orientation

Published Date

2014-10

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Existing research has found that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) college students are less likely to engage in healthful weight-related behaviors than heterosexual students. This dissertation builds on these findings by addressing three aims: (1) to identify major weight-related behavioral profiles by sexual orientation and gender; (2) to examine the relationship between institutional supports for LGB college students and weight-related behaviors; and (3) to explore the context surrounding weight-related health among LGB college students.In Aim 1, data from the 2009-2013 College Student Health Survey were used to fit latent class models. Overall, four distinct profiles were identified: "healthier diet," "moderate diet," "unhealthy weight control," and "healthier diet, physically active." Heterosexual and bisexual women exhibited all four profiles, discordant heterosexual women did not exhibit a "moderate diet" profile, and neither gay/lesbian nor unsure women exhibited "healthier diet, physically active" profiles. Heterosexual men exhibited all four profiles, discordant heterosexual men exhibited two profiles ("healthier diet" and "unhealthy weight control"), and gay, bisexual, and unsure men did not exhibit "healthier diet, physically active" profiles.In Aim 2, institutional-focused LGB supports (including school policies, institution-administered LGB and diversity organizations, and housing) were associated with more favorable weight-related behavioral profiles for heterosexual and some bisexual women. In contrast, these supports were associated with less favorable weight-related behavioral profiles for some gay and unsure men. Student-engaged LGB supports (including courses offered and student-run LGB groups) were not associated with students' weight-related behavioral profiles across sexual orientation and gender.In Aim 3, individual interviews with LGB, queer, and pansexual college students were conducted. Many felt their sexual orientation helped them be physically activity, engage in healthful eating habits, and have a positive body image. However, their sexual orientation was also a source of stress that adversely impacted physical activity and eating habits. Participants identified the need for institutional-level interventions to promote physical activity, healthy eating, and positive body image among LGB students.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. October 2014. Major: Epidemiology. Advisors: Melissa N. Laska, PhD, RD, Darin J. Erickson, PhD. 1 computer file (PDF); viii, 168 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

VanKim, Nicole Allison. (2014). A mixed methods approach to understanding weight-related behavioral disparities among college students by sexual orientation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/168318.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.