Professionalization of Program Evaluation: A Comparative Mixed Methods Case Study of Canada and the United States
2020-06
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Professionalization of Program Evaluation: A Comparative Mixed Methods Case Study of Canada and the United States
Authors
Published Date
2020-06
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
Professionalization of evaluation means different things to different people across the globe. This study explored the professionalization of program evaluation in Canada and the United States of America (US) using sociological models of professionalism as the guiding framework for assessing the level of maturity of program evaluation as a field of professional practice. Five concepts identified by the model were used to develop a professionalism assessment tool for program evaluators (PAToPE) to measure the behavioral attributes of professionalism: professional autonomy, expertise, ethical dispositions, innovation and research, and credentialing. Data for the study were collected using a sequential mixed-methods approach starting with interviews of 27 evaluators and a test of the measurement instrument in an online survey to a random sample of 1,000 American Evaluation Association (AEA) members and 573 Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) members from the 2017 membership directory. The results of the study suggest that credentialing is the major difference between Canada and the US and that Canada is perceived to be more advanced in the professionalization of evaluation than the US. The empirical information also suggests that program evaluators demonstrate professionalism differently by country, place of work, gender, credentialed evaluator status, level of skills, level of education, age, and years of evaluation practice. The study concludes with implications and recommendations for professional associations, evaluation practice, and future studies.
Description
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2020. Major: Organizational Leadership, Policy, and Development. Advisor: Jean King. 1 computer file (PDF); x, 331 pages.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Suggested citation
Ayoo, Sandra. (2020). Professionalization of Program Evaluation: A Comparative Mixed Methods Case Study of Canada and the United States. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/216419.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.