Technical characteristics of e-based vs. paper-pencil CBM tasks for students who are deaf and hard of hearing

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Technical characteristics of e-based vs. paper-pencil CBM tasks for students who are deaf and hard of hearing

Published Date

2015-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

To increase literacy outcomes for students who are deaf and hard of hearing, professionals need to provide high quality instruction that is informed by accurate and valid assessment data. This study compared the reliability and validity of student scores from paper-pencil and e-based assessments, “Maze” and “Slash.” Forty (N=40) students, who were deaf or hard of hearing and read between the second and fifth grade reading level, participated. Twenty-one teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing also participated. For Maze, alternate form reliability coefficients obtained from correct scores and correct scores adjusted for guessing ranged from .61 to .84 (ps < .01); criterion-related validity ranged from .33 to .67 (majority of ps < .01). These findings are generally consistent with findings from previous research. For Slash, alternate form reliability coefficients obtained from correct scores ranged from .50 to .75 (ps < .01); criterion-related validity ranged from .25 to .72. The extent to which testing modifications delivered in an electronic-based (e-based) format influenced student scores was also examined. Differences between paper-pencil and e-based conditions were generally non-significant for Maze; significant differences between conditions for Slash favored the paper-pencil condition. Overall, findings suggest that Maze holds promise for use with students who are deaf and hard of hearing in both conditions, with inconclusive results for Slash. Future research is needed to explore the impact of providing testing modifications through e-based progress monitoring tools.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. December 2015. Major: Educational Psychology. Advisors: Kristen McMaster, Susan Rose. 1 computer file (PDF); vi, 134 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Lam, Elizabeth. (2015). Technical characteristics of e-based vs. paper-pencil CBM tasks for students who are deaf and hard of hearing. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/177146.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.