Comparative Studies of Drop Impingement Erosion and Cavitation Erosion
1969-04
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Comparative Studies of Drop Impingement Erosion and Cavitation Erosion
Authors
Published Date
1969-04
Publisher
St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory
Type
Report
Abstract
It has been theorized that the fundamental mechanism of cavitation
erosion was essentially the same as that of impingement erosion. The tests conducted in this study were intended to provide additional cavitation and impingement data to support this theory. The tests were conducted on three materials supplied for an ASTM round-robin cavitation test program.
Complete cavitation tests and limited impingement tests on the three
ASTM materials are described together with test data on two other metals. Further descriptive material on details for impingement testing is also included.
Only a limited comparison of cavitation and impingement erosion was
possible with the data available. This suggests that accelerated laboratory erosion tests may, in fact, over-accelerate the erosion to such an extent that it is not possible to tie the observed erosion to the prototype problem.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Fluid Dynamics Branch of the Office of Naval Research;
Naval Ship Research and Development Center
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Ripken, John. (1969). Comparative Studies of Drop Impingement Erosion and Cavitation Erosion. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/108322.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.