Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Physical and Image Analysis Sizing of Mine Run Taconite Ore

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Physical and Image Analysis Sizing of Mine Run Taconite Ore

Published Date

1993-10

Publisher

University of Minnesota Duluth

Type

Technical Report

Abstract

The United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) has developed an image analysis system to determine the size distribution of mine-run taconite ore. The results can be used to evaluate fragmentation so that blasts can be designed for better productivity. ~he Coleraine Minerals Research Laboratory (CMRL) has been testing the system at Minntac with apparent success, but there was no method available for testing the accuracy of size distributions determined by image analysis. The Iron Ore Cooperative Research Committee approved and funded a project to screen mine-run ore and compare the results to sizing by image analysis. Three samples, about 2500 tons each, were sized on 6 and 12 inches in a contractor's vibrating grizzly plant at Minntac. Size analyses were extended to 65 mesh by sizing samples of minus-6 inch at the Coleraine laboratory. Between 30 and 60 plus- 12 inch pieces from each bulk sample were measured to provide thickness-width-length aspect ratios and to indicate large-fragment dimensions and weights that are encountered in mine-run ore. The average ratio of thickness to width to length was 1.00:2.20:3.21. Fragment volumes ranged from 4 to 80 cubic feet. Weights of these would be approximately 800 pounds and 16,000 pounds. After the size fractions had been weighed, they were recombined, each sample was loaded into rail cars, and they were dumped at number one primary crusher. The USBM and CMRL video-taped the ore as it was dumped and processed the tapes through a computer to produce an image analysis size distribution for each of the three samples. Because of a large discrepancy between the contractor's and the track scale weights, the size analysis of sample number one was not acceptable. The physical size analyses of samples two and three and their corresponding image analysis size distributions were nearly identical for fragment widths of at least 12 inches. Size. distributions of mine-run ore by the image analysis system have been proven reliable for evaluating the effective fragmentation of individual blasts for sizes down to 12 inches in width.

Description

Coleraine Minerals Research Laboratory, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

NRRI Technical Report;CMRL/TR-93-07

Funding information

Funded by the Iron Ore Cooperative Committee

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Niles, Harlan B. (1993). Physical and Image Analysis Sizing of Mine Run Taconite Ore. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200929.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.