Enabling Neighborhood Health Research and Protecting Patient Privacy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Enabling Neighborhood Health Research and Protecting Patient Privacy

Published Date

2021-08

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Maps and spatial analysis offer a more comprehensive understanding of complex neighborhood health relationships, and yet there is a remarkable lack of maps within the literature on neighborhood health. Review of the literature confirmed that only a small proportion of articles on neighborhood health (28%) contained maps. Despite this, our subsequent survey showed that the majority (63%) of investigators created maps, worked with maps, or used mapping software to explore their data at some point during their study. Neighborhood health investigators are not neglecting to explore the spatial nature of their data, but rather, they are just not publishing the maps that they are using. One of the major barriers identified by our survey was privacy regulations, such as HIPAA law, which stood as a direct barrier for 14% of survey respondents who created maps but did not share them. Many researchers find core elements of the HIPAA privacy provision specific to map data ambiguous or difficult to understand, which is reflected in disagreement and uncertainty in research and policy circles on how to enact this provision. This dissertation provides a thorough examination of the safe harbor provision and elucidates the ambiguity within the law to encourage safe and effective sharing of mapped patient data. Moreover, many scholars and policy makers have challenged this rule, saying that it is possible to share finer-grained mapped health data without jeopardizing patient privacy. One promising strategy is regionalization, or zone design, which offers a way to build finer-grained geographical units in ways that integrate the HIPAA safe harbor requirements. This dissertation explores two existing regionalization methods (Max P Regions and REDCAP) and also introduces two novel variants of these approaches (MSOM and RSOM) which we compare and contrast in terms of fitness for analysis and display of protected health information. Each regionalization procedure has its own strengths and weaknesses, but REDCAP provides the best overall performance. In general, all of the regionalization procedures produced contiguous regions that result in a better resolution map than the current standard for sharing patient data and offer to help investigators work within the bounds of privacy provisions to share maps and spatial data.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. August 2021. Major: Geography. Advisors: Steven Manson, Michael Oakes. 1 computer file (PDF); vi, 129 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Krzyzanowski, Brittany. (2021). Enabling Neighborhood Health Research and Protecting Patient Privacy. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/225021.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.