Unpacking Effects of Perceived Familiarity with COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Message Perceptions, Affects, and Determinants of Vaccination: A Moderation Analysis of Two Types of Message Features

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Unpacking Effects of Perceived Familiarity with COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Message Perceptions, Affects, and Determinants of Vaccination: A Moderation Analysis of Two Types of Message Features

Alternative title

Published Date

2024-07

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

The proliferation of health misinformation poses a significant threat to public health, making it increasingly important to understand why misinformation is accepted. The illusory truth effect, which refers to the increased believability of a message due to repeated exposure, has been widely studied. However, the specific influence of perceived familiarity with vaccine misinformation on message perceptions, emotional responses, and vaccination behavior determinants remains underexplored in the context of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. The dissertation seeks to fill the gap and further examines whether misinformation message features, including source credibility and evidence types, affect the magnitude of effects of perceived familiarity with COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. The findings from two experimental studies suggest that perceived familiarity enhanced perceived accuracy and agreement with COVID-19 vaccine misinformation, lessened confusion about the misinformation, and reduced the intention to verify the misinformation. Source credibility intensified perceived accuracy and emotional distress but did not interact with perceived familiarity to affect message perceptions, affects, and determinants of vaccination behavior. Regarding evidence types employed by vaccine misinformation, statistical and combined evidence types were more effective than narrative evidence in enhancing perceived message effectiveness, eliciting negative emotions, and increasing information verification intentions. Furthermore, evidence type did not moderate the effects of perceived familiarity on outcome variables, with one exception: confusion. The dissertation adds to the literature on the illusory truth effect in the sense that source credibility and evidence type do not moderate the effects of perceived familiarity with COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on message perceptions, vaccine attitudes, and vaccination intentions. These findings reinforce the robustness of familiarity effects or the illusory truth effect; even message features cannot moderate the effects. This dissertation calls for further research into interventions that can mitigate the familiarity effects of health misinformation and explores strategies that leverage perceived familiarity to enhance the dissemination of accurate health information.

Keywords

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. July 2024. Major: Mass Communication. Advisor: Marco Yzer. 1 computer file (PDF); xii, 254 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Fang, Yuming. (2024). Unpacking Effects of Perceived Familiarity with COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Message Perceptions, Affects, and Determinants of Vaccination: A Moderation Analysis of Two Types of Message Features. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/269197.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.