Writings on the Wall: The Need for an Authorship-Centric Approach to the Authentication of Social-Networking Evidence

Title

Writings on the Wall: The Need for an Authorship-Centric Approach to the Authentication of Social-Networking Evidence

Published Date

2013-04-15

Publisher

University of Minnesota. Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences

Type

Article

Abstract

People are stupid when it comes to their online postings. The recent spate of social-networking websites has shown that people place shocking amounts of personal information online. Unlike more traditional modes of communication, the unique nature of these websites allows users to hide behind a veil of anonymity. But while social-networking sites may carry significant social benefits, they also leave users - and their personal information - vulnerable to hacking and other forms of abuse. This vulnerability is playing out in courtrooms across the country and will only increase as social-networking use continues to proliferate. This Article addresses the evidentiary hurdle of authenticating social-networking evidence, a novel legal issue confronting courts today. The Article explains and critiques four approaches used by different jurisdictions, concluding that each approach fails to adequately address the critical issue of authorship. The anonymous nature of social-networking websites, coupled with the extent of users’ personal information available online, raises serious concerns about the authorship of any piece of evidence posted to one of these sites. Litigants are using social-networking postings in court, attributing authorship to a particular person without demonstrating a sufficient nexus between the posting and the purported author. Absent this nexus, however, the evidence fails to meet even the low hurdle of authentication. To remedy this problem, this Article proposes that courts shift their focus from account ownership and content to authorship of the evidence. Working within the existing rules of evidence, this approach underscores the importance of fairness and accuracy in the outcome of judicial proceedings that involve social-networking evidence.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Volume 13, Issue 1 (Winter 2012), pages 1-36.

Suggested citation

Robbins, Ira P.. (2013). Writings on the Wall: The Need for an Authorship-Centric Approach to the Authentication of Social-Networking Evidence. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/147600.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.