RANKED CHOICE COULD DIMINISH EQUALITY

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

RANKED CHOICE COULD DIMINISH EQUALITY

Published Date

2013-08-07

Publisher

Type

Report

Abstract

Keywords

Description

Our Star Tribune article on August 7, 2013 is based on a landline RDD phone survey that was fielded by the Information Specialists Group (ISG) between November 4th (the day after the 2009 municipal elections) and November 9th. In total, 300 Minneapolis voters, 204 Minneapolis nonvoters, 300 St. Paul voters, and 202 St. Paul nonvoters were interviewed. The response rate for the Minneapolis survey was between .29 (AAPOR RR1) and .46 (AAPOR RR6) and the response rate for the St. Paul survey was between .24 (AAPOR RR1) and .41 (AAPOR RR6).1 The response rate for the combined survey was between .26 and .44.2 The survey did not include cell phones – a decision that reflected common practice in 2009. Although the number of respondents is modest, all of the results of our analyses of RCV and political equality that were discussed in our Star Tribune article are “statistically significant” using standard analysis techniques. We report these tests of statistical significance below as well as our results.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Center for the Study of Politics and Governance, Humphrey School of Public Affair, University of Minnesota

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Jacobs, Lawrence R.; Miller, Joanne M. (2013). RANKED CHOICE COULD DIMINISH EQUALITY. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200505.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.