Travels Impacts of Bridge Closures 1: Lafayette Bridge Final Report
2010-09-13
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Travels Impacts of Bridge Closures 1: Lafayette Bridge Final Report
Authors
Published Date
2010-09-13
Publisher
Type
Report
Abstract
This study evaluates traffic reactions to two alternative construction plans of Lafayette Bridge crossing the Mississippi River in downtown Saint Paul, Minnesota. We calibrate a travel demand model previously developed and evaluate network performance in dif- ferent construction phases of the two alternative scenarios. Most significant changes in traffic condition occur during the bridge closure phase of scenario 2. The measur- able impacts of bridge closure on traffic conditions are limited within the region of I-494 and US 61 to the east and I-35E to the west. The increases in freeway traffic are moderate. Most travelers choose to use the arterial bridges as alternative routes. The Robert Street Bridge and the Wabasha Street Bridge will see significant traffic increases. Overall changes in consumer surplus indicate that scenario 2 has a some- what higher user cost ($5,209/day). However, the magnitude of difference in consumer surplus is very small and well within “margin of error”. The ultimate decision needs to consider construction cost savings due to faster construction, and safety issues in addition to changes in user cost.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Levinson, David M; Zhu, Shanjiang. (2010). Travels Impacts of Bridge Closures 1: Lafayette Bridge Final Report. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/181327.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.