Revisiting three comparisons of unobserved conditional invariance techniques for the detection of differential item functioning

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Revisiting three comparisons of unobserved conditional invariance techniques for the detection of differential item functioning

Published Date

2014-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Within social science research, data are often collected using a measurement instrument that produces ordered-categorical data. When comparing scores created from a measurement instrument across subpopulations, measurement invariance must be a tenable assumption. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT) are two unobserved conditional approaches to assessing measurement invariance. Within the research literature, there are three often cited simulation studies that compare the two unobserved conditional invariance techniques. Because the research design of the three studies varied greatly, the results of the studies are contradictory and not comparable. In this simulation study, the true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) rates of the IRT and CFA approaches to assessing measurement invariance are evaluated under four manipulated factors: (a) source of Differential Item Functioning (DIF), (b) size of DIF, (c) sample size, and (d) baseline model. The parameters used for the data generation came from a five-item unidimensional scale with four ordered-categories (i.e., Likert-scale). The results suggest that the IRT model using a free-baseline is the most precise model. Additionally, regardless of the model chosen, a free-baseline model is most favorable across all conditions of source of DIF, size of DIF, and sample size. Finally, the TP and FP rates of the studied models vary as a function of source of DIF, size of DIF, sample size, and baseline model. The significance of these results for social science research is discussed.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. December 2014. Major: Educational Psychology. Advisors: Ernest C. Davenport, Jr, Geoffrey M Maruyama. 1 computer file (PDF); viii, 133 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Love, Quintin Ulysses Adrian. (2014). Revisiting three comparisons of unobserved conditional invariance techniques for the detection of differential item functioning. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/171432.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.