Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

International Participants’ xMOOC Perspectives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

International Participants’ xMOOC Perspectives

Published Date

2018-10

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are an example of what is now possible through education technologies. Due to their unique reach and viral growth, many universities have developed MOOCs since 2011. Sometimes over 100,000 participants enroll in a single MOOC. MOOCs promise to increase the reach of higher education internationally especially to those who currently lack access. The mission of Coursera, one of the leading MOOC providers, is to “provide universal access to the world’s best education”. Multiple studies have noted that the overwhelming majority of MOOC participants are international, yet their experiences have not been thoroughly analyzed by geographical region. This dissertation analyzes data from five Coursera MOOCs. MOOCs developed by Coursera are considered “eXtended” MOOCs or “xMOOCs” which are different in format to “Connectivist” MOOCs or “cMOOCs”. This dissertation study analyzes international participant experiences in five MOOCs to improve our understanding of who these participants are, why they are participating, what are the positive and negative aspects of their experience, and what suggestions they have for improving these MOOCs. This study analyzes data collected during an evaluation of five Coursera MOOCs from 2012-2013. A pre-course survey (N = 21,178), a post-course survey (N = 2,793), a survey for international participants (N = 1,757), and focus groups with international participants (N = 81) were conducted. This study also takes into consideration the author’s own experiences as an xMOOC participant. Surveys were studied through a series of chi-square tests. Focus groups were analyzed using theme analysis. While the majority of participants in xMOOC are international, they participate in xMOOCs for a diverse series of reasons some of which are more prevalent depending on their geographical region. Participants’ outlook on the future of MOOCs is also varied yet overall most participants considered xMOOCs to be a very positive opportunity for learners that was not available to them before. This study found significant differences in international participants’ experiences according to their geographical region, as well as similarities between all international participants. The study also identified two primary groups of international participants, those from lower HDI regions, and those from higher HDI regions. Some of the concerns shared by international participants have been addressed by MOOC developers but additional changes could be made to better address the needs of international participants.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. October 2018. Major: Educational Policy and Administration. Advisors: Gerald Fry, Bodong Chen. 1 computer file (PDF); xiv, 670 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Sintjago, Alfonso. (2018). International Participants’ xMOOC Perspectives. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/201662.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.