Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off

Published Date

2001

Publisher

Pergamon

Type

Article

Abstract

Ramp meters in the Twin Cities were turned off for 8 weeks in the Fall of 2000. This paper analyzes traffic data collected in this experiment on travel time variability with and without ramp metering for several representative freeways during the afternoon peak period. Travel time variability is generally reduced with metering. However, it is found that ramp meters are particularly helpful for long trips relative to short trips. The annual benefits from reducing travel time variability with meters are estimated to be $33.1 million, compared to the annual ramp metering costs of $2.6 million in the Twin Cities metro area. Thus, the impact on travel time variability should be captured in future ramp metering benefit/cost analysis.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Nexus Papers;200309

Funding information

Minnesota Department of Transportation

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Levinson, David and Lei Zhang (2001) Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off. in The Network Reliability of Transport (ed. Yasunori Iida and Michael Bell) Pergamon.

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Levinson, David M; Zhang, Lei. (2001). Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/179874.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.