Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off
Authors
Published Date
2001
Publisher
Pergamon
Type
Article
Abstract
Ramp meters in the Twin Cities were turned off for 8 weeks in the Fall of 2000. This paper analyzes traffic data collected in this experiment on travel time variability with and without ramp metering for several representative freeways during the afternoon peak period. Travel time variability is generally reduced with metering. However, it is found that ramp meters are particularly helpful for long trips relative to short trips. The annual benefits from reducing travel time variability with meters are estimated to be $33.1 million, compared to the annual ramp metering costs of $2.6 million in the Twin Cities metro area. Thus, the impact on travel time variability should be captured in future ramp metering benefit/cost analysis.
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Nexus Papers;200309
Funding information
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Levinson, David and Lei Zhang (2001) Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off. in The Network Reliability of Transport (ed. Yasunori Iida and Michael Bell) Pergamon.
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Levinson, David M; Zhang, Lei. (2001). Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/179874.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.