Alternative Technology for Sediment Remediation Demonstration Plant
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Alternative Technology for Sediment Remediation Demonstration Plant
Alternative title
Alternative Technology for Sediment Remediation Demonstration Plant: Final Report for Detroit District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Natural Resources Research Institute Technical Report
Published Date
2000-11
Publisher
University of Minnesota Duluth
Type
Technical Report
Abstract
Duluth-Superior Harbor is a major port on Lake Superior located between the cities of
Duluth, Minnesota, and Superior, Wisconsin. The harbor and the lower Saint Louis River that
discharges into the harbor area have a history of water quality problems resulting primarily from
municipal and industrial discharges in and upstream of the harbor. The port is a major debarking
point for grain shipments overseas and for taconite pellets for the lower Great Lakes ports. To
allow navigation, the shipping channels must be dredged annually. The dredged material has
been stored in a confined disposal area developed at the Erie Pier location in Duluth. This
facility is nearing its capacity and other methods for handling the dredged material must be
found. The Coleraine Minerals Research Laboratory, a division of the Natural Resources
Research Institute of the University of Minnesota - Duluth, has been studying the application of
mineral processing techniques for treating contaminated soils. The laboratory sampled the Erie
Pier site and designed a demonstration plant to treat about 50 tph of material from the site.
Based on the previous work and the plant design, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers awarded the
laboratory a contract to construct and operate the demonstration plant.
The plant consisted of a feeder followed by a grizzly screen to remove large rocks and
miscellaneous junk. The grizzly undersize was conveyed to a double deck screen equipped with
water sprays. The screen undersize flowed to a sump and pump. The slurry was then pumped to
an agitated tank. Material from the tank was pumped to two cyclones to make a size separation.
Cyclone overflows were collected and channeled to settling ponds to allow the solids to settle
and to provide water for the plant. Cyclone underflow was stockpiled as a sand product. In
addition to sending the cyclone overflow to the settling ponds, a belt filter press was tested for
about two weeks to treat a portion of the overflow to produce a cake that could be easily handled
and a clear filtrate that could be recycled.
The objective of the program was to treat different types of materials found at the Erie
Pier site to produce a coarse product (cyclone underflow) that contained less than 12 percent by
weight particles finer than 200 mesh (75 microns). The underflow should be free draining so
that it could be moved by loaders. The distribution of solids, water, inorganic compounds and
organic compounds would be monitored. The settling characteristics of the cyclone overflow
would be determined.
A total of four separate samples were processed in the plant. Sample 1 was a sandy feed
containing between 13 and 32 percent in the passing 200 mesh fraction. Sample 2 was a finer
material that was removed from the site during construction of the settling ponds. Sample 2
contained between 30 and 52 percent in the passing 200 mesh fraction. Sample 3 was a fine
sample dug from the north end of the site where the finest material should have been. Sample 3
was only run for one day due to a break down of the front-end loader used to transport the feed to
the plant. The fourth sample was the drained cyclone underflow from the processing of samples
2 and 3.
Maintaining a consistent feed to the plant was a continual problem. Clay material in the
feed was difficult to disagglomerate and the material tended to form balls, which rolled down the
screen decks. Additional water sprays and belting on the top screen deck improved the break up
of the clay material but did not eliminate the problem. Another feed problem was the amount of
vegetation in the feed. This material tended to bridge in the feeder and to plug the two screen
decks, reducing screening capacity, at times significantly. Compounding the feed problem was
the loss of the variable frequency drives on the two pumps. Loss of the drives effectively
eliminated the ability to make any significant changes in the flowrate to the cyclones and, hence,
the ability to affect the cyclone split. Attempts were made to control the cyclone feed by
installing a by-pass line to return some of the cyclone feed back to the cyclone feed sump. These
attempts were unsuccessful and on numerous occasions resulted in overloading the cyclone feed
pump motor causing the motor to stop.
Samples of the cyclone feed, overflow and underflow, as well as belt filter press cake and
filtrate, when operating, were taken hourly. These samples were saved for future analysis. In
addition to the saved hourly samples, a grab sample of each stream was taken hourly and made
into a daily composite. The daily composites were filtered with a portion of the filtercake being
used for size analysis and the remainder being air dried for chemical analysis.
Sample 1 was processed at feed rates up to about 63 tph with no loss in performance. In
all tests with Sample 1, the cyclone underflow contained less than 10 percent in the passing 200
mesh fraction. Weight recovery to the underflow ranged between 73.3 and 92.6 percent. In
general, the heavy metals and organic material were concentrated in the cyclone overflow, but
since the total weight recovery in the cyclone underflow was high, the majority of the heavy
metals and organics in the feed remained with the cyclone underflow.
The processing of Samples 2 and 3 were more difficult due to the large amount of
vegetation contained in the feed. Plant feed rates were generally between 7 and 14 tph. The low
feed rates were caused by the vegetation problem and by the need to feed the cyclone a low
percent solids to try to make the desired size split. But even at the low percent solids in the feed,
the cyclone underflow contained between 18 and 29 percent in the passing 200 mesh fraction.
Weight recovery to the underflow ranged from 55 to 72 percent. Despite the high minus 200
content, the cyclone underflow was easy to dewater and formed into a steep sided conical pile.
As with Sample 1, the heavy metals and organics were concentrated in overflow sample, which,
due to the higher weight recovery, contained the majority of the heavy metals and organics from
the feed.
Since the cyclone underflows from Samples 2 and 3 still contained too many fines, the
cyclone underflow pile was reprocessed through the plant. Resultant cyclone underflow
contained between 10.9 and 14.7 percent in the minus 200 mesh fractions and recovered over 90
percent of the feed weight. Again the heavy metals and organics concentrated in the cyclone
overflow.
Performance of the belt filter press was very impressive. The resultant filtercake was
very easy to handle by conveyor belts and would be very easy to haul by truck. The filtercake
was almost dry to the touch. Filtrate from the belt filter press was very clean, with turbidity
measurements less than 5 ntu. To produce these results required about 1.5 pounds of polymer
flocculant for every 3900 gallons of cyclone overflow treated. Analysis of the filtrate indicated
no residual polymer in the water.
Description
Final Report for Detroit District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Contract DACW35-00-C-0010; Project #5600403 and 5601401
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
NRRI Technical Report;NRRI/TR-2001/05
CMRL Technical Report;CMRL/TR-01-02
CMRL Technical Report;CMRL/TR-01-02
Funding information
Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811-1442; Coleraine Minerals Research Laboratory, One Gayley Avenue, PO Box 188, Coleraine, MN 55722
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Contract DACW35-00-C-0010
Project #5600403
Project #5601401
Project #5600403
Project #5601401
Suggested citation
Benner, Blair R; Wu, Chuying; Zanko, Lawrence M. (2000). Alternative Technology for Sediment Remediation Demonstration Plant. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/188544.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.