Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Reading Deboer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: from constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings

McClain, Linda C.
2016
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

7 - McClain.pdf (647.8 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183095
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Reading Deboer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: from constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings

Authors

Published Date

2016

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Type

Article

Abstract

Keywords

Description

Part of: Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: Six Views and a Response. Reviews of Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution, by James E. Fleming New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 31, Number 3 (Fall 2016)

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 31, Number 3 (Fall 2016), pages 441-477

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

McClain, Linda C.. (2016). Reading Deboer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: from constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183095.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.