Reading Deboer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: from constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings

McClain, Linda C.
2016
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Title

Reading Deboer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: from constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings

Published Date

2016

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Type

Article

Abstract

Keywords

Description

Part of: Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: Six Views and a Response. Reviews of Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution, by James E. Fleming New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Related to

item.page.replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding Information

item.page.isbn

DOI identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 31, Number 3 (Fall 2016), pages 441-477

Other identifiers

Suggested Citation

McClain, Linda C.. (2016). Reading Deboer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: from constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183095.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.