Finding the Way With Cyclopath

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Finding the Way With Cyclopath

Published Date

2011-04-13

Publisher

Type

Presentation

Abstract

In the past few years, Cyclopath has become an outstanding example of a geographic wiki, or "geowiki", and a valuable resource to Twin Cities cyclists. For site creator Reid Priedhorsky, it has also been an opportunity to study recommender systems in a new context. In his doctoral thesis, he studied a variety of possible heuristics for predicting users' ratings of byways in the cities. However, his research only compared these predictors at the lowest, node level. This project extends the research to study how different predictors lead to the recommendation of different routes to users. This leads to higher level questions such as: How 'different' are two predictors? How 'different' are the routes that they generate? Does one generate 'better' routes than others? The ensemble predictors tested call into four main groups, which are similar within themselves but distinct from each other in the routes they generate. Though quantification of the differences in routes has been simple, evaluating the routes holistically--and the predictors that generated them--is beyond the scope of automated analysis and will have to be done by cyclists themselves.

Description

Additional contributor: Loren Terveen (faculty mentor)

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Pitchford, David. (2011). Finding the Way With Cyclopath. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/104435.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.