Topics on Climate Model Output Analyses

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Topics on Climate Model Output Analyses

Published Date

2021-10

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Comparison of two different data samples, and of paired data samples, is a well known problem in Statistics. Specifically, there is a wide range of applications in the fields of climate study. In this thesis, we provide a brief review on the ensemble of climate models and the need of probabilistic evaluation of model outputs, which is equivalent to the comparison between two models. Based on recent advancements in the context of evaluating climate model outputs, we develop two different approaches for comparing two functional time series. The first one is based on wavelet decomposition and the second one by comparing the local spectral density of non-stationary series. For the last chapter, we conduct a brief review on Gaussian Process and a framework for Bayesian Optimization, which establishes a theoretical framework and algorithmic properties of t-process based spatio-temporal modeling, for further use in modeling climate and neuroscience data.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. October 2021. Major: Statistics. Advisors: Snigdhansu Chatterjee, Nathaniel Helwig. 1 computer file (PDF); vi, 184 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Gong, Kaibo. (2021). Topics on Climate Model Output Analyses. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/241390.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.