Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Measuring Reliability in profile analysis.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Measuring Reliability in profile analysis.

Published Date

2012-02

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Profile analysis has been used practically to study assessments with subtests or strands. The variation in profile analysis can be divided into two kinds: variation due to profile level and variation due to profile pattern. The variation in the profile level or the level reliability is the proportion of total profile variation due to the true score variation in the level whereas the variation in the profile pattern or the pattern reliability is the proportion of total profile variation due to the true score variation in the pattern. Methods to compute the level reliability and the pattern reliability are described. The methods are demonstrated using two datasets: a short personality inventory and the Woodcock- Johnson Psychoeducational Battery II. The results showed that pattern reliabilities were higher than the level reliabilities in both the rating scale (r= 0.66) and the forced choice versions (r= 0.71) of the personality inventory while the level reliability was higher in the Woodcock- Johnson Psychoeducational Battery II (r= 0.93). Results demonstrated that when the variation from the pattern and level are unequal, it is critical for researchers to examine whether the level or the pattern has higher reliability and adequately explain the results.

Keywords

Description

University of Minnesota M.A. thesis. Febrauary 2012. Major: Educational psychology. Advisor: Mark L. Davison. 1 computer file (PDF); iv, 29 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Chang, Yu-Feng. (2012). Measuring Reliability in profile analysis.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/122125.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.