Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Deconcentrating Poverty in Minneapolis: Hollman v. Cisneros. Report No. 1: Policy Context and Previous Research on Housing Dispersal.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Deconcentrating Poverty in Minneapolis: Hollman v. Cisneros. Report No. 1: Policy Context and Previous Research on Housing Dispersal.

Published Date

2002

Publisher

Minneapolis: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA)

Type

Report

Abstract

Description

In July 1992, attorneys for the Minnesota Legal Aid Society and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) filed suit in federal district court on behalf of a group of plaintiffs living in public housing in Minneapolis alleging that the public housing and Section 8 programs in the city perpetuated racial and low-income segregation. The co-defendants in the Hollman v. Cisneros lawsuit offered to enter into settlement negotiations with the plaintiffs, and in April 1995, a consent decree was signed that committed the co-defendants to a series of dramatic policy changes aimed at deconcentrating family public housing in Minneapolis. In 1999, CURA was contracted by the nonprofit Family Housing Fund and the State of Minnesota to conduct an evaluation of the implementation of the Hollman consent decree. The findings of the three-year evaluation are presented in a series of eight reports, which conclude that the implementation of the consent decree produced mixed results with respect to the construction of replacement housing units, the reductions of race and poverty concentration in public housing in the Twin Cities, and the use of special mobility certificates made available by the decree. This report, the first in the series, provides the context for understanding the settlement agreement contained in the Hollman consent decree. A history of subsidized housing dispersal efforts during the past 30 years is presented. The report contains a comprehensive review of studies during that time period that investigated how dispersal works and what its impacts are on families and communities. The Hollman decree is one of several similar settlements across the country that attempted to combine at least two recent federal initiatives in public housing: (1) the redevelopment of older, less functional public housing projects into mixed-income, mixed-use communities that contain a much lower density of public housing units (this approach is the thrust of the federal HOPE VI program); and (2) the use of housing vouchers to allow low-income families to move out of neighborhoods of high poverty (the so-called housing mobility approach exemplified by the federal Moving to Opportunity [MTO] demonstration program.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

CURA;01-5

Funding information

Sponsored by the Family Housing Fund and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Goetz, Edward G. (2002). Deconcentrating Poverty in Minneapolis: Hollman v. Cisneros. Report No. 1: Policy Context and Previous Research on Housing Dispersal.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/204428.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.