Competing while injured: what wrestlers do and why.
2012-05
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Competing while injured: what wrestlers do and why.
Authors
Published Date
2012-05
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
The normalization of risk culture within sport injury has created an environment where
athletes train and compete while injured despite the known health risks (Nixon, 1992,
1996; Wiese-Bjornstal, 2010). Athlete beliefs about their capacity to perform while in
pain and pressure from social network sources are factors thought to influence their risk
taking behaviors related to training and competing while injured. The purpose of this
study was to examine this risk subculture characterized by pain beliefs, risk behaviors,
and social network influences in the context of a demanding, high injury risk sport.
Intercollegiate wrestlers (N = 195) at fifteen National Collegiate Athletic Association
(NCAA) Division I universities participated by completing a paper and pencil survey,
which consisted of a demographics questionnaire, the Sports Inventory for Pain (SIP), the
Risk Behavior Conformity in Sport Injury Questionnaire (RBSCI), and the Sport
Network Pressure and Support Questionnaire. Results of a multiple regression analysis
examining the ability of beliefs to predict deceit behaviors among those wrestlers with
prior injuries showed a significant model (p = .03, Adjusted R square = .043), with the
SIP Coping subscale score a significant predictor of the RBCSI Deceit Behaviors (β = -
.30, p = .001). Employing direct pain coping thought processes such as ignoring pain and
toughing it out were directly related to the undesirable behaviors of deceiving others
about one’s health status. A second multiple regression analysis also showed a
significant model (p = .003, Adjusted R square = .074) in which two belief measures were
significant predictors of RBCSI Impression Management Behaviors, SIP Coping (β = -
.20, p = .022) and SIP Catastrophizing (β = -.23, p = .01). Direct pain coping thought processes (such as ignoring pain and toughing it out) and catastrophizing thoughts (such
as dwelling on pain and giving up when in pain), were directly related to the undesirable
actions associated with maintaining a tough façade. With respect to analyses concerning
behaviors and injury components, frequency of injury was moderately correlated (r = .42,
p < .05) with RBCSI Healthy Behaviors, with high frequencies of injury associated with
the more likely use of healthy behavior strategies. Social network influences descriptive
analyses showed that coaches (69.5%) and teammates (63.5%) were reported to “always”
or “sometimes” pressure wrestlers to compete while injured. Wrestlers felt pressured to
compete while injured “always” or “sometimes” 20.8% of the time by their athletic
trainers and 10.9% of the time by their physicians. Implications of these results are
discussed as they relate to the beliefs and behaviors of athletes, influences of their social
network sources, and ties to injury components.
Keywords
Description
University of Minnesota M.A. thesis. May 2012. Major: Kinesiology. Advisor: Diane M. Wiese-Bjornstal. 1 computer file (PDF); viii, 80 pages, appendices A-K.
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Suggested citation
Hoppis, Shelby Allison. (2012). Competing while injured: what wrestlers do and why.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/130935.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.